Improving access out of hours: Evaluation of extended-hours primary care access hubs

Nuffield Trust | May 2019 | Improving access out of hours: Evaluation of extended-hours primary care access hubs

The Nuffield Trust was commissioned by Barking, Havering and Redbridge CCGs to evaluate the impact of access programmes in these boroughs.

The schemes aimed to improve the quality of primary care services and to improve patients’ experience and outcomes over a two-year period.

care-check-checkup-905874.jpg

The schemes involved:

  • improving public access to primary care by providing additional capacity outside of core hours
  • the development of a new integrated care hub for the management of people with complex care needs.

Key findings:

  • Most of the patients we interviewed told us that they had chosen to attend the hubs because they found it difficult to attend in-hours primary care services. Others said that they had wanted a speedy clinical assessment for themselves or their children.
  • Patients particularly liked the appointment-based system at the hubs and this was what they highlighted when distinguishing between the hubs and other services such as walk-in centres and A&E departments.
  • Since the hubs opened, there has been an increase in the use of A&E services across the boroughs. However, during our research the size of this increase appeared to be associated with hub attendance in that it was significantly lower in areas where hub attendance was highest by approximately 4.5%. This suggests that the presence of the hubs may have been diverting some people who would otherwise choose to attend A&E, or who may have been sent to A&E by NHS 111, away from this service.
  • However, from a commissioning perspective, such reductions in A&E attendance would not be enough to offset the local cost of providing the hub service.
  • During the study, a call centre had been introduced to improve the appointment booking process. By 2016, between 80% and 90% of patients attending the hubs were recorded as self-referrals, presumably because they had used the call centre. The number of referrals from NHS 111 had remained more stable and generally not increased as new hubs opened.
  • The hubs had adapted to lower demand on Sundays by reducing opening hours and staffing, thus ensuring that Sunday usage rates were comparable to usage rates on other days of the week.
  • Some staff working at the hubs raised concerns about their lack of access to patients’ medical records and their inability to refer patients on for further treatment. Both these areas require effective systems to be in place to avoid the potential of increased clinical risk.
  • Survey responses from staff working at the hubs revealed a largely positive attitude towards working at the hubs, with 59% of staff saying that working at the hubs was better than their other or previous work.
  • It is possible that the hub scheme may have had an effect on the locum market in the area: some staff not working at the hubs suggested that higher locum rates being paid to hub staff might reduce the availability of locums for in-hours work.

Full details from the Nuffield Trust

Improving Access for All

NHS England | July 2018 | Improving Access for All

NHS England have released a short animation that underlines inequalities of access to to GP general practice services. The film provides  advice to CCGs on how to address the issue.

The film is based on research findings from academics at the University of East Anglia, which originally gave rise to a toolkit for commissioners.

 

Related:

University of East Anglia Access to GP research 

NHS England Toolkit for Commissioners 

Paying for quality and outcomes: IAPT case studies

NHS England & NHS Improvement | April 2018 | Paying for quality and outcomes: IAPT case studies

To support commissioners and providers to implement a cluster-based payment approach, NHS England and NHS Improvement published Developing an outcomes-based payment approach for adult IAPT services in January 2017.

Now, NHS England  & NHS Improvement  have co-produced a series of case studies based on the experience of five clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and NHS trusts who have developed and implemented, or are in the process of developing and implementing, an outcomes-based payment approach for IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies) services (NHS England & NHS Improvement).
The case studies are from:

  • Birmingham CrossCity CCG
  • Humber NHS Foundation Trust
  • South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS FT
  • South Tees CCG
  • Wakefield CGC 

Socioeconomic status and geographical factors associated with active listing in primary care

Socioeconomic status and geographical factors are associated with health and use of healthcare. Well-performing primary care contributes to better health and more adequate healthcare. In a primary care system based on patient’s choice of practice, this choice (listing) is a key to understand the system | BMJ Open

accessibility-1682903_960_720.jpg

Objective: To explore the relationship between population and practices in a primary care system based on listing.

 

Conclusions: Higher income, shorter education, shorter distance to primary care or longer distance to hospital is associated with active listing in primary care.

Multimorbidity, age, geographical location and type of primary care practice are more important to active listing in primary care than socioeconomic status and distance to healthcare.

Full reference: Ranstad. K. et al. (2017) Socioeconomic status and geographical factors associated with active listing in primary care: a cross-sectional population study accounting for multimorbidity, age, sex and primary care. BMJ Open. 7:e014984.